|
|
Last 20 Posts
comment by RKZ on May 05, 2003 03:53 pm ET
re: LoA Dragon Armor - 10% Fire Resistance
BAH! Ancient Plate Mail is stil betta! ehehehe..^_^
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by RKZ on May 05, 2003 03:50 pm ET
re: Moving Day!
LC is evolving ^.^, congratz, now post my drawing >_<! plz..
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by K-ZS-M on May 05, 2003 03:21 pm ET
re: LoA Dragon Armor - 10% Fire Resistance
watch them take out the resistance all together
then all DSMs don't have any resistance....
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by TheCollector on May 05, 2003 03:13 pm ET
re: Spotlight: Kyzah
you ppl who think kyazh edits too many posts, well thats my theory of one of the reasons mel was booted, because he didnt censor as much as the company wanted.
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by EcKs on May 05, 2003 01:34 pm ET
|
comment by TLFmaster on May 05, 2003 01:29 pm ET
re: Moving Day!
Hmm... it does seem a lot faster. Does this mean LCBay will be around soon?
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by Weathersmurf on May 05, 2003 01:25 pm ET
re: Public Service Announcement
#294 - NoLuCK
No; someone else mentioned "word games" before. However, semantics are the difference between cheating and not cheating, since whether something is cheating or not depends on how the rules are worded.
If you get 500,000,000 silver arrows for 100 adena and NC coded it intentionally, that means that 1 adena is now worth 5,000,000 silver arrows instead of 5. If NC made a typo, that would be a bug.
If something works correctly as intended by the programmer then it is not a bug.
The only way something can be intentionally be programmed and not work as intended is if it were not programmed correctly. If you use this argument, you are saying NC did not intend for prat prices to be 200a at Pandora, but something else entirely, but somehow coded wrong.
In this case, it functioned properly (assuming that NC did intend for prat prices to be 200a, which you did admit). Perhaps it was not balanced in terms of the rest of the game, but it functioned as intended. However, players used the function in a way that was perhaps unintended, but that is A WHOLE DIFFERENT MATTER and irrelevant.
There are reasons to "fix" intentionally game imbalances. For example, b2s was too good, therefore they changed the delay. Does this mean they were "fixing" a "bug"? Should I be banned for using b2s before the update that increased the delay?
A bug is anything that is not a bug, and the dictionary defines "bug" quite nicely =P
So, if I ever hunt and make money (especially if I don't use pots, arrows, etc) I am turning zero adena into adena, which is worse than turning 100a into 110a =P
Wow, I'm flattered. Now let's be friends.
#295 - NathanS
So the shorter b2s delay was a bug? SoMs were a bug? The change in price was labelled a change by NC Korea, rather than a bug fix.
I guess all of Hitler and Stalin's victims were cheating.
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by Tissot on May 05, 2003 01:24 pm ET
re: Moving Day!
Your old server clock doesnt seem to be runing at all. (upper left corner)
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by amer on May 05, 2003 01:14 pm ET
re: Moving Day!
No, that's an unintended and positive side effect :)
I think it might be that Apache 2.0.45 is more compatible with your browser than Apache 1.3.27..
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by Firien on May 05, 2003 01:11 pm ET
re: Moving Day!
Login works better with Safari, too ;)
Is this the progress you were working towards, amer?
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
Previous Page
Next Page
|
