Thank you donors!
Donations: + $1151.26
Costs: - $1228.00
Explanation.
Monday, September 1, 2003
 
You are one of 80 visitors.

Central Time (-5 GMT)

  Latest News
  Read Latest Comments
  Archived News & Search
  Comments Search

  Fan Contributions (8/12)
  Level 50+ Hall of Fame (8/22)
  Deathmatches (5/5)

  LC Spotlight (8/12)
  Lineage Real Pics (1647 pics)
  Dlirk's Smooch Files (6/11)
  Lineage IRC ( online)
  Calculators (9/18)
  Castle Control
  Screenshots
  Downloads (7/29)
  Media Guide (2/10)
  Login

  Stats Explanation (9/11)
  Lineage Commands (5/26)
  Item Creation Guide (2/4)
  Equipment Guide (6/29)
  Magic Guide (7/3)
  Map Guide (2/25)
  Monster Guide (2/19)
  Morph Guide (12/6)
  Music Guide (12/30)
  Quest Guide (7/10)
  Links (7/29)
  About (5/24)
 

Corrections? Typo? Problems?
Suggestions? Questions? email us:
web@lineagecompendium.com!
 
Last 20 Posts
comment by Tueur on March 25, 2003 12:03 pm ET
re: Weddings
LOL! Nice, Saph.

The difference between this and btel is that you don't need a bookmark. You can be ANYWHERE (well, if I'm guessing right, anywhere bookmarkable).

Too few bookmark slots? Split them up between you and your spouse: now you have double the locations: spouse has 1/2, you have 1/2. When you need to get somewhere, the person w/ the bookmark goes to the spot, then the other tele's to them.

I'd like to see this ring allow users to call each other to spots that aren't normally bookmarkable. Need to camp a boss? No problem. Need pots on DVC6? Not an issue. Want to join your spouse in ToI? Go right ahead. That doesn't seem too much to ask for, given it only works w/ couples.

Oh...and this was brought up: what about an NPC that morphs you into tux and dress for the ceremony!?!? ^_^
Go to discussion

comment by SaphireBlue on March 25, 2003 11:52 am ET
re: Weddings
Diamonds are sooo over-rated. >_______<
Go to discussion

comment by juggalo on March 25, 2003 11:35 am ET
re: Weddings
hey morons this is for fun and recreation you dont HAVE to do it so stop whining
its basically for fun and is somewhat usefull.
Go to discussion

comment by Morticae on March 25, 2003 11:33 am ET
re: Lich Robe
No, this robe is really worthless if all of that is true. Which leads me to believe it's not. Generally our first reports from Korea are false.
Also, it looks like it adds +30MP (base, not regen) instead of the +50 we were originally told.
Go to discussion

comment by PebDiGaetano on March 25, 2003 11:25 am ET
re: Weddings
mmm can you pawn the ring to a shop?????
Go to discussion

comment by Carol on March 25, 2003 11:22 am ET
re: Lich Robe
The ARobe gives +12mp per tick.

The lich for the info we got here seems to give a lot, but beeing so rare and droping from a very hard mop (lich maybe isnt that tough, but geting to it is), isnt good...

It would be good if it gave enough regen so mages could hunt with spells, but for that to happen you wont need only regen, would also need better spells... Go sunburst a ettin to death... Even if i had unlimited mp im not sure it would be my choice to do that... You will need more heals from the damage u take casting sunburst then the ettin would damage if u used a sof.
Go to discussion

comment by duk3t on March 25, 2003 11:16 am ET
re: Lich Robe
Why are you guys complaing 50mp.. per tick..thats wonderfull..That will easily cut of a fewminutes off of regenreation time.. I have a lvl 47 int-wiz mage and this robe would make me want to play it again. I don't play it now cuz I hate regenerating..this robe is wonderful
Go to discussion

comment by Rincewind on March 25, 2003 10:50 am ET
re: Weddings
LMAO...the guys get screwed just like in r/l! That's too funny...
Go to discussion

comment by marak2001 on March 25, 2003 10:38 am ET
re: Weddings
Sigh what a lame ring idea heeh. Babo nc.
Go to discussion

comment by lungshou on March 25, 2003 10:30 am ET
re: Weddings
That's funny spyfox. :)

Hey, in all your calculations don't forget the cost of getting back and forth to the Aden church to get your recharge. The expensive ring would save you money there also.

:>
Go to discussion

Previous Page       Next Page