|
|
Last 20 Posts
comment by taluss on April 30, 2003 05:38 pm ET
re: 5/1 - Server Publish
WHAT ABOUT THE PANDORA PRICE CHANGE THAT GOT EVERYONE BANNED?
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by FatBoy on April 30, 2003 05:32 pm ET
re: 5/1 - Server Publish
Because they didn't have everything ready in time. So they will do it a day later^^. just be thankful they don't make you wait til next week for it.
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by FatBoy on April 30, 2003 05:30 pm ET
re: Public Service Announcement
The reason that SOL and the alliance never gets banned is because they have a high lvl pledge member that works at NC O.o. So they just dismiss everything that is siad to be bad about them. Which is totally unfair.
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by sam12345 on April 30, 2003 05:30 pm ET
re: Public Service Announcement
that doesnt seem like a bug, buying low selling high...
just my 2cent
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by Bushido on April 30, 2003 05:30 pm ET
|
comment by Daos on April 30, 2003 05:26 pm ET
re: Public Service Announcement
name some o fthe people who got banned plz!!!!
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by EX-CON on April 30, 2003 05:20 pm ET
re: Public Service Announcement
sol never get bann for this kinda of stuff.
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by Typhoon on April 30, 2003 05:20 pm ET
re: Public Service Announcement
Looks like when one side does something wrong its an automatic ban... but when the other side does something to violate the TOS, NC looks the other way ... Hmmmm... still NC believes it violated its TOS. Too bad they can't be evenhanded about it and treat everyone the same.
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by flexy24k on April 30, 2003 05:20 pm ET
re: Public Service Announcement
From what I heard only the ones who actually used the bug were perma banned. Those who just talked about it got 3 day bans unless they had prior felonies on their record, in which case they also received the end dai penalty...
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by muleque on April 30, 2003 05:19 pm ET
re: Public Service Announcement
Ok, if I"m in a pledge that owns a castle, and I am told "Hey, here's an entrepreneurial idea, go buy stuff from this vendor and sell it to our own store to boost revenue!", I"m not gonna think twice about it being against TOS. It's not! Even if I'm doing it maliciously thinking "Hey, Pandora sells RC scrolls for 100a and if I sell them to our store whose taxes are 50% makes the revenue 300a for me and tax for the castle revenue!!", I'm sorry, that's still not a TOS issue. It's something NCI should look at and think of a solution. If some players, or a whole pledge want to blow all their cash by doing this, then so be it. It's NCI's mistake for lack of foresight. At the very worst, NCI should take away all revenue for a period of castle ownership warning the pledge to not do those practices anymore, and then they should fix those things. Perhaps make things purchased not returnable at any vendor. Only make mop drops sellable. I dunno, it's up to NCI to figure that one out.
But in all reality, I'm sure that the offenders did more than just be entrepreneurs. Judging by that whiners remarks in Templar Gaming's board, I'd say he's quite guilty sounding as he describes justifying some hacks and exploits, but not others. He sounds lke the kind of guy that goes around looking for trouble and exploits.
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
Previous Page
Next Page
|
