|
|
Last 20 Posts
comment by gobigred on July 12, 2003 06:31 am ET
re: Dark Elf: 30/45 Quests
+50hp with regen quality. My question is, can the DE use elven cloak. Think about that. If they can wear both and with B2S, that would be pretty slick. Wouldn't the +1 con gloves add to the regen speed depending upon their original CON?
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by Carol on July 12, 2003 04:36 am ET
re: July 10 - Level 50 + chart
On ken the 56 knight is avmilk, the 55 i'm not sure but probally toy
i know fyreblade, dutchpower and heavyarmx are 54 knights, but dp and heavyarmx just lved so maybe they were listed as 53.
Both lvl 51 mages on ken are close to dk, kurei3 and miawcat.
And i dont think the HoC is all that accurate, if u take out innactive ppl it would be kind far from matching the NC numbers.
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by juggalo on July 12, 2003 02:15 am ET
|
comment by McLeans on July 12, 2003 01:39 am ET
|
comment by theperv on July 12, 2003 01:20 am ET
re: July 10 - Level 50 + chart
I think ppl that are banned can return with in-game char same name if the old acc is perma banned and their chars deleted except they'll restart of course with same name. No one is going to give them their acc back & they'll most likely use a different credit card/name/email/address or use money order to avoid being known as long as their name is different. Nc cant do nothing if Bob decides to move in to Rob's 237 Cherry Springs Blvd & as long as the money orders keeps on rolling then they'll have to let Bob (who is also Rob) play as Linplayer439.
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by FlaRrRr on July 11, 2003 07:39 pm ET
re: July 10 - Level 50 + chart
actually #109 they can someday play again maybe o_O PeNTeL somehow got himself unbanned... dunno how that happend but its possible and i think they should show banned in a diff color or something o_o
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by Goshen on July 11, 2003 06:41 pm ET
re: July 10 - Level 50 + chart
#108 I don't know what that was I quit for a long time and came back recently please explain so I understand better.
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by Cosers on July 11, 2003 06:06 pm ET
re: July 10 - Level 50 + chart
#109 dep would own ken anyway, 3 lvl 62's > 1 lvl 63 o.O and besides it has much more lvl 50+ers than ken
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by Shinoda on July 11, 2003 05:41 pm ET
re: July 10 - Level 50 + chart
Good god... everyone shut up -.- This is a list of CURRENT levels.. The people who matter, the people who actually are here. Counting banned people is useless, because they can't play, so techincally they don't exist at all, since they can never be accessed again. So why argue about everything ~_~
Who cares who would win ken vs dep... It won't happen, so dont waste your time arguing about it o_o
"If so and so wasn't banned, we would own ken" well they were banned.. times change.. deal with it..
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
comment by 87 on July 11, 2003 05:24 pm ET
re: July 10 - Level 50 + chart
#107, no, the mass banning of the "prat exploit" were dumb
|
|
Go to discussion
|
|
Previous Page
Next Page
|
